Fleming Horn

Male 1853 - 1927  (73 years)


Generations:      Standard    |    Vertical    |    Compact    |    Box    |    Text    |    Ahnentafel    |    Fan Chart    |    Media    |    PDF

Generation: 1

  1. 1.  Fleming Horn 12 Jun 1853 Kentucky (son of Jackson Horn and Mary Warner); 19 May 1927Middletown, Butler County, Ohio; 21 May 1927Kentucky.

    Other Events:

    • Residence: 27 Jul 1860, Estill County, Kentucky

    Notes:

    Died:
    Note: Some of the informant's information was incorrect.


Generation: 2

  1. 2.  Jackson Horn about 1820 Kentucky (son of Aaron Horn and Elizabeth Barker).

    Other Events:

    • Residence: 18 Oct 1850, Estill County, Kentucky
    • Residence: 27 Jul 1860, Estill County, Kentucky

    Notes:

    Name:
    Jackson Horn as a child of William Horn and Susannah Hall is unsubstantiated. In addition, I have found no evidence yet for a marriage of William Horn and Susannah Hall. However, William's brother, Aaron Horn, was married to a woman named Susannah as evidenced in their Revolutionary War pension files. (See Aaron Horn person ID: I3172).

    Jackson Mary Warner. Mary (daughter of John Warner and Nancy Horn) about 1820 Estill County, Kentucky; about 1880Estill County, Kentucky. [Group Sheet] [Family Chart]


  2. 3.  Mary Warner about 1820 Estill County, Kentucky (daughter of John Warner and Nancy Horn); about 1880Estill County, Kentucky.

    Other Events:

    • Residence: 18 Oct 1850, Estill County, Kentucky
    • Residence: 27 Jul 1860, Estill County, Kentucky

    Notes:

    Name:
    Mary Warner as a child of John Warner and Nancy Horn is complete speculation at this time. I have seen no documents positively linking Mary to John and Nancy. There is credible Census information for Jackson Horn married to a Mary (or Polly, a common nickname for those named Mary).

    Children:
    1. Sarilda Horn about 1841 Kentucky.
    2. Amanda Horn 28 Apr 1842; 20 Oct 1895; Houp Cemetery, High Bridge, Jessamine County, Kentucky.
    3. Vina Horn about 1843 Kentucky.
    4. Wesley Horn about 1845 Kentucky.
    5. John Horn about 1847 Kentucky.
    6. Aaron Horn about 1849 Kentucky.
    7. 1. Fleming Horn 12 Jun 1853 Kentucky; 19 May 1927Middletown, Butler County, Ohio; 21 May 1927Kentucky.
    8. Elizabeth Horn about 1856 Kentucky.
    9. Nancy Horn about 1857 Kentucky.


Generation: 3

  1. 4.  Aaron Horn about 1799 Kentucky (son of William Horn and Susan).

    Other Events:

    • Residence: 18 Oct 1850, Estill County, Kentucky

    Aaron Elizabeth Barker 20 Dec 1818Kentucky. Elizabeth about 1820 Kentucky. [Group Sheet] [Family Chart]


  2. 5.  Elizabeth Barker about 1820 Kentucky.

    Other Events:

    • Residence: 18 Oct 1850, Estill County, Kentucky

    Children:
    1. Nancy Horn
    2. 2. Jackson Horn about 1820 Kentucky.
    3. William Horn about 1825 Kentucky.
    4. Westley Horn about 1826 Kentucky.
    5. Woodson Horn about 1830 Kentucky.
    6. Mitchell Horn about 1834 Kentucky.
    7. Rebecca Horn about 1837 Kentucky.
    8. Susan Jane Horn about 1841 Kentucky.
    9. Thomas Horn about 1843 Kentucky.

  3. 6.  John Warner about 1797 North Carolina (son of William Warner and Anna); after 18 Jun 1880.

    Other Events:

    • Residence: 1840, Estill County, Kentucky
    • Residence: 28 Aug 1850, Estill County, Kentucky
    • Residence: 28 Jul 1860, Estill County, Kentucky
    • Residence: 29 Jul 1870, Lee County, Kentucky
    • Residence: 18 Jun 1880, Lee County, Kentucky

    Notes:

    [Schimka.ged]

    DOCUMENTS: Documents are online at http://www.schimka.com withdescriptions and file mumbers as follows:
    The File number is the important part as some documents have multiple ancestors and the same document will be referenced under these multiple ancestors but the document will only have one title in my online database. Don't worry if the name referenced below doesn't match the person in this genealogy database just remember to look up the document by the File Number.
    Title: John Warner 1850 Census Estill County, KY
    File Number: 16
    Title: John Warner 1870 Census Lee County, KY
    File Number: 17
    Title: John Warner 1860 Census Lee County, KY
    File Number: 18

    John Nancy Horn 12 Feb 1816Madison County, Kentucky. Nancy (daughter of William Horn and Susan) about 1795 Estill County, Kentucky; after Jul 1870. [Group Sheet] [Family Chart]


  4. 7.  Nancy Horn about 1795 Estill County, Kentucky (daughter of William Horn and Susan); after Jul 1870.

    Other Events:

    • Residence: 29 Jul 1870, Lee County, Kentucky

    Children:
    1. James Warner about 1830 Estill County, Kentucky; after 28 Jul 1860.
    2. Aaron Warner 1 Feb 1830 Estill County, Kentucky; 11 Apr 1922Beattyville, Lee County, Kentucky; 1922Lee County, Kentucky.
    3. Zachariah Warner about 1841 Madison County, Kentucky.
    4. 3. Mary Warner about 1820 Estill County, Kentucky; about 1880Estill County, Kentucky.


Generation: 4

  1. 8.  William Horn 16 Jul 1765 Kent County, Maryland (son of Aaron Horn and Elizabeth); 9 Dec 1842Estill County, Kentucky.

    Other Events:

    • Will: First, all of my debts are to be paid; and all of my estate real and personal, I bequeth to my wife, Susannah Horn her lifetime to do as she pleases with it; and to Elizabeth Watson, I bequeath all past favors; Nancy Horn, Aaron Horn, Jimmy Watson, and Polly Hawk, I give 25 cents apiece and Charles Horn and Warren Horn my land is to be divided between them. My personal estate at the death of my wife is to be divided between Derisha, Perlina and Symantha Horn, so as all may have an equal share. The above was wrote in the presence of the subscribing witness. Attest: his John Wallace William X Horn William Lancaster mark September Court Estill County 1842 Robert Clark Clerk
    • Known Presence: April 1778 - September 1778, Fort Boonesborough, Kentucky; William accompanied his father to Kentucky when he was about 12 years old and as Stephen Hancock stated in a deposition given for a court case in 1803, ". . . that Aaron Horn, deceased husband of Mrs. Horn and father of Christopher Horn, moved to this country in the Spring of 1778 and died the following fall in the last of September or the first of October at Boonesborough. He [Hancock] lived in the same fort with him from the time he [A Horn] came to this country until he died . . ." and the statement of William Horn, ". . . that he WM. came to this country with his father A Horn, and knows the statement made by Stephen Hancock to be accurate."; : 12
    • Residence: 7 Aug 1820, Ravenna, Estill County, Kentucky
    • Residence: 1830, Estill County, Kentucky

    Notes:

    The following excerpt from the "Horn Timeline" (widely distributed on the Internet) makes reference to a lawsuit that is important to the genealogy of the Horn Family. Collecting these documents for examination and inclusion in the research is desirable.

    Of particular importance is this quoted statement from the deposition of William Horn:
    "William Horn, being sworn, states that he WM. came to this country with his father A Horn, and knows the statement made by Stephen Hancock to be accurate."

    The preceding statement indicates that William Horn came to Kentucky with his father which, when cross-referenced with the court case in the excerpt below, that arrival date, according to one Stephan Hancock, was in the Spring of 1778. Furthermore, Stephan Hancock stated that he lived with Aaron Horn (who was accompanied by his son, William Horn) in Fort Boonesborough until Aaron Horn's death in at the end of September or beginning of October in 1778.

    "Stephan Hancock fully sworn, stated that Aaron Horn, deceased husband of Mrs. Horn and father of Christopher Horn, moved to this country in the Spring of 1778 and died the following fall in the last of September or the first of October at Boonesborough. He (Hancock) lived in the same fort with him from the time he (A Horn) came to this country until he died . . ."

    -------1802 ---------------------------------------------------------
    August. 26 Elizabeth Horn files suit in Madison County Court to regain land taken by her son Christopher Horn. Christopher, as the eldest son under the old inheritance laws of primogeniture, was legally entitled to all of his father?s property in the absence of a will. Most of the family sided with Elizabeth in her fight to reclaim land that her son allegedly pressured her into deeding to him. The surviving records of this case provided extensive information about the early history of the Horn family during the early years in Kentucky.

    Madison County chancery Court Records
    Be it remembered heretofore to wit on the 26th day of August 1802, Elizabeth Horn by her attorney, filed in the clerk?s office of the quarter session court for Madison County, her bill in Chancier against Christopher Horn and others, and issued out a subpoena in chancery thereon, which bills are in the following words
    and figures to wit: To the Honorable Judges of the court of Quarter Session for Madison County in chancery setting.
    Elizabeth Horn, humbly complaining, shews to your Honor that she together with her husband in the year 177_ moved to the county and very shortly after , her husband died and that after the death, she raised in this county a crop of corn in 177_ and by virtue and in according to the act of the General assembly of Virginia, in such case made and provided, she applied to and obtained from the commissioners a certificate of preemption of 400 acres of land in what is now Madison County, an attested copy of which certificate she submits and prays that it may be taken as part of this her bill of complaint: that sometime after she obtained a certificate, she entered into a contract with James Estill to locate and clear out the 400 acres of land for her; that she transferred the right (of land) to him and took his obligation to convey to her 200 acres ( of the 400) when a grant should be obtained from the Commonwealth; that after she had received the obligation from Estill, Christopher Horn, the eldest son of her deceased husband ( and whom she prays may be made a defendant) claimed the land as heir to her husband and threatened to sue her if she did not assign to him the obligation upon Estill; that she being timid and fearful of being harassed with law and being persecuted by Christopher Horn, that his right to the land as heir to her husband was good, she signed the obligation for the 200 acres to C Horn; that he never gave her any consideration for the land whatsoever and has since transferred his right and interest in the land to Jesse Noland, (whom she also wishes to be made a defendant); that James Estill has died and left Benjamin Estill, his eldest son and his heir at law in whose name a grant from the Commonwealth has been issued ( and whom she also wishes to be made a defendant) ; that the defendants are combining and federating to injure and oppress her, particularly Jesse Noland and Christopher Horn has refused to give up to her the obligation (for the land) and cancel the assignment and Jesse Noland has brought suit in chancery to compel a conveyance of the 200 acres against Benjamin Estill, all which actions and doings are contrary to equity and good conscience and tend to manifest injury and oppression against her.

    For as much as Mrs. Horn is remedy-less in the promises by the strict rules of the common law and can only be relieved in this court whose frauds and mistakes are relieved against and contracts are carried into specific execution. To the end therefore the that the defendants true and distinct and perfect answers make to all and singular the premises and fully and perfectly as if the same were herein again repeated and interrogated and in particular that C Horn set forth and say: Is not the above a true statement and ,if not, what is? (2} Did he not claim the land as heir of law to Mrs. Horn?s husband? (3) Did he not claim the obligation (to the land) by falsely representing his claim as better than hers and threatening to sue her? (4) What did he give her for the bond? That the defendant, Noland may say: Is not above as it respects him a true statement and if not, what is? That your honor will decree that the assignment of Mrs. Horn (to Christopher Horn) be canceled and that Benjamin Estill convey to her the right to the two hundred acres agreeable to the obligation and give other such and further relief as may be agreeable to equity and that the C?wealth writ of warrant be directed. signed: --Hardin and Boyle for Mrs. Horn

    Copy of Elizabeth Horns certificate for 400 acres referred to in bill:

    Elizabeth Horn this day claimed a preemption of 400 acres of land at the state price in the district of Kentucky lying on the north side of the Kentucky River above the Coporas Lick including a bottom known by the name of the Coperas Lick Bottom by making a deluxe settlement in 1778. Satisfactory proof being made to the court they are of the opinion that she has a right to preemption of the 400 acres of the land to include the above location and that a certificate issue accordingly.
    28 December 1779 Attested: Thomas Todd
    Subpoena issued by court
    The Commonwealth of Kentucky to the Sheriff of Madison County. Greetings, you are hereby commanded to summon Christopher Horn, Jesse Noland and Benjamin Estill to appear before the Justices of our Court of Quarter Session for the county of Madison on the first Monday in September next to answer to a bill in chancery submitted against them by Elizabeth Horn and this they shall in no wise omit under the penalty of 100 pounds each and have them here. This writ witness: William Irvine, clerk of said court at the Commonwealth this 26th day of August 1802 and in the 15th year of the Commonwealth. WM. Irvine
    This case was continued for answer from court to court from September Court 1802 until February 1803 by rules held in the Clerk?s office.

    Obligation from Estill to Elizabeth Horn
    Know all men by these presents that I James Estill of the County of Kentucky and state of Virginia, am held and firmly bound unto Elizabeth Horn and Matthew Horn of the county and state aforesaid in the sum of one thousand pounds Virginia currency unto which payment will and truly to be made. I bind myself, my heirs, executors, administrators and every one of them in the penal sum of two thousand pounds like lawful money. Signed, sealed and delivered this 17th January 1780. The condition of the above bound James Estill is such that if the said Estill shall make a good and lawful title to a tract of land containing four hundred acres, two hundred of which is to be the property of Elizabeth Horn and two hundred the property of Matthew Horn. Which land is to be of some of the preemption land which said Estill has purchased then the above obligation is to be void, otherwise to remain in full force and virtue. signed, sealed and delivered in presence of Robert Walton and Michael Shearly.
    Signed: James Estill

    Copy on back of that assignment
    I do assign all my right title and interest of my part of this bond to Christopher Horn. March 1785
    Witness: Robert Walton Elizabeth (x) Horn
    Michael Shearly Matthew (x) Horn

    Depositions: Stephen Hancock, Joseph Proctor, Jesse Hodges, William Horn and Matthias (Matthew) Horn taken at the house of Robert Caldwell in Richmond on the 15th January 1803 on behalf of Elizabeth Horn to be read as evidence in the suit in Chancery in Madison county where Elizabeth is complainant and where Christopher Horn and others are defendants.
    Stephan Hancock fully sworn, stated that Aaron Horn, deceased husband of Mrs. Horn and father of Christopher Horn, moved to this country in the Spring of 1778 and died the following fall in the last of September or the first of October at Boonesborough. He (Hancock) lived in the same fort with him from the time he (A Horn) came to this country until he died and does not know of Aaron Horn raising any corn or planting any corn that year and is satisfied that he made no provisions for his family by raising corn. He (Hancock) further states that the next year after her husband died , Mrs. Horn put her sons Matthew ,Aaron and William who were under age, to work with A Mr.Thomas Deal who together raised a crop of corn.

    Joseph Proctor being sworn that he knew the same as to Aaron Horn coming to this country and death as stated by Stephen Hancock and is convinced that he did not raise any corn in this country as he recollects of his Horns renting some ground but before he planted, he differed from the person he rented of and gave it up.
    He further stated that he had frequent conversations with Christopher Horn as to the manner of his getting the land from his mother in which conversation, He(C Horn said that he threatened his mother with a suit if she did not give it up, He claiming it as heir at law to his father until the old woman gave it up to him. He also said after he got it he did not care whether the right of the land came through his father or mother, He would be damned if he did not keep it for he had as good a right to it as anyone. He (Proctor) had frequently heard C Horn threaten to sue his mother if she did not give up the bond and the old woman appeared very uneasy about it, she being not able to read or write in English.

    Jesse Hodges , being sworn stated that he was acquainted with Aaron Horn Sr., deceased and knows what is stated by Stephen Hancock to be accurate. He also stated that in or about the year 1786, C Horn had a case of this speaker and Mrs. Horn lived in a cabin near C Horn?s and under him and that while they lived there He ( Hodges) wrote the assignment on the bond from Mrs. Horn to C Horn, and He Hodges thinks the assignment was made in consequence of C Horn?s claiming the land as heir to his father and threatened to sue her for it. Question By Mrs. Horn Did you at the time of the writing of the assignment tell me that tell me you thought I was cheated? Answer At the time of the assignment I did not but some years after ward I told you I thought the assignment was fraudulently obtained and you ought to advertise it if you meant to contend for the land. I then at your request wrote about three advertisements(one of which is attached) and gave them to you to set up.

    Copy of the advertisement
    This is to forewarn all persons for trading for a bond given to me by James Estill for two hundred acres of land to be out of some of ye preemption that Estill cleared out of shares and (it is) assigned to Christopher Horn as the assignment was fraudulently obtained and I have forewarned Estill from making ye said Christopher Horn a right. I expect the said Horn to trade the bond off.
    Elizabeth (X) Horn

    William Horn, being sworn, states that he WM. came to this country with his father A Horn, and knows the statement made by Stephen Hancock to be accurate. The next year after his father came here, under the direction of his mother, He and his brothers Matthias and Aaron, all being under age worked with Mr. Thomas deal and raised a crop of corn in partners to help his mother, she having one half and Mr. Deal the other half. He further states that when C Horn came to this country some years later, He claimed the land as heir to his father and threatened to sue her and as she had but one or two cows, It would take them to fee a lawyer and she would lose them and the land too. That he continued his threats for a year or two until the old woman gave up the bond. After He got the bond he said he knew it was his mothers right but he wanted to get the title in his own hands before she knew it; he further said he (Wm.) set up advertisements similar to the one referred to by Jesse Hodges. One as set up at Irvine Lick and the other at Mrs. Woodruff?s. (Question by Jesse Noland) Have you any interest in the event of this cause? (Answer) My mother has said that she will give me part of the land if she gains it, but I never gave her anything for it and having but her word for it,. Christopher Horn also promised me fifty acres of land for taking care of his stock while he went into the old settlement.

    Matthew Horn, being sworn, says that he agrees in the statement made by Hancock. He frequently heard C Horn before he got the bond threaten to sue his mother. The old woman frequently came to me and cried and told me of his threats and told me if he sued her it would take all she had left (the Indians having taken all of their horses and part of their cattle) and is convinced it was for fear of the trouble and expense of going to law that she gave up the bond. (Question by Noland) Have you any interest the event of this suit? (Answer} I do not expect to gain or lose one copper by it.

    At a Circuit Court continued and held for the Circuit aforesaid at the Courthouse in Richmond on the 7th June 1803. This day came the parties by their attorneys and the court having considered the bill, depositions and exhibits in the cause, do order and decree that the assignment of the alluded to by Mrs. Horn in her bill from her to Christopher Horn be canceled and said obligation given up and further that the defendant, Benjamin Estill by the first day of September next convey 200 acres of land to Mrs. Elizabeth Horn by proper deed agreeable to the obligation assigned and that she recover of Christopher Horn her costs in this suit expended.

    Will:
    Copied from internet (http://www.fewpb.net/~estillco1/hornhist1.htm)

    Will of William Horn is said to be recorded in:

    Estill Co Will Book A pg 220

    At the time this note was written (Feb 2012) the only Will records available online at Family Search are for dates later than William's death.

    Known Presence:
    Source is an Internet post which in turn was referenced as coming from Madison County, Kentucky Court Records; copies of these records are in the process of being obtained. (DJS - 15 Feb 2013).
    16 April 2013: Having borrowed several rolls of microfilm, I am disappointed that this court case was not found among them. Some of the microfilm were indexes, purposely borrowed to help pinpoint the records. Others appeared to be court case files but seemed to be more of a collection of warrants to appear in court. There are a couple more microfilm rolls labeled in a different collection but the years covered means that the complete court case may not be recoverable from them, IF such a case truly exists at all. A note to other researchers: Make an effort to document your sources and when possible, post copies of the original records so that others don't spend time and money repeating the same research over and over again. None of my research is for sale; all of the historical documents I recover are posted here in an effort to further the research.
    FHL Film Number: 2218279 (Case Not Found)
    FHL Film Number: 2241448 (Case Not Found)
    Please note that due to time constraints I was not able to look through every image on these films. There are other Horn cases referenced within the images contained on the above referenced films.

    So, Aaron Horn came to Kentucky with much of his family in tow and lived in the Fort at Boonesborough from April 1778 until his death at the end of September or the first of October of the same year. The Siege of Boonesborough took place September 7-18, 1778.

    Residence:
    There are five slaves listed on this census record.

    William Susan about 1797Fayette County, Kentucky. Susan about 1774 Virginia; after 18 Oct 1850Kentucky. [Group Sheet] [Family Chart]


  2. 9.  Susan about 1774 Virginia; after 18 Oct 1850Kentucky.

    Other Events:

    • Residence: 18 Oct 1850, Estill County, Kentucky

    Notes:

    This family was the nucleus of most Horn families in Estill and Lee Counties.

    Children:
    1. 7. Nancy Horn about 1795 Estill County, Kentucky; after Jul 1870.
    2. Elizabeth Horn about 1798 Kentucky.
    3. 4. Aaron Horn about 1799 Kentucky.
    4. Jane Horn about 1799 Kentucky.
    5. Mary Horn about 1800 Kentucky.
    6. Charles Horn about 1803 Kentucky.
    7. Jerusha Horn about 1808 Kentucky.
    8. Warren Horn about 1814 Kentucky.
    9. Samantha Horn
    10. Peggy Horn

  3. 12.  William Warner about 1775 NC (son of William Warner and Elizabeth).

    William Anna. [Group Sheet] [Family Chart]


  4. 13.  Anna
    Children:
    1. 6. John Warner about 1797 North Carolina; after 18 Jun 1880.